TED 2009: Wired For War

PWSinger.png

From pwsinger.com
“Dr. Singer is considered one of the world’s leading experts on changes in 21st century warfare. He has written for the full range of major media and journals, including the Boston Globe, L.A. Times, New York Times, Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, Current History, Survival, International Security, Parameters, Weltpolitik, and the World Policy Journal.”

Dr.Peter Warren Singer studies and writes about war. He was recently on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart, to talk about his new book ‘Wired for War’ If he cranked TDS’s geekometer to 11, It is quite likely that the geekometer here at TED will break.

If Moore’s law holds true, robots will become even more powerful than they are today. There is a revolution in the instruments of war. They affect not only the how, but the who of fighting wars. It changes the experience and identity of the warrior. You have to think of other countries working on robotics. What does this mean about the state of education, science and tech in America. As sw has gone open source, so has warfare. The components can be sourced from around the world. Bad guys can also make drones just like Hobbyists (like GeekDad) do.
2 trends
-Reinforcement of power of individuals against govt.
- Al-Qaeda 2.0 and a shift in tactics of terrorist organizations that might use robotics in their attacks. ‘You do not have to convince a robot that they will get 72 virgins for their sacrifice’

The future of war will also be a youtube war. The war will be recorded, most of the footage gathered by drones. This is typically termed as ‘war porn’. It will affect the public’s experience of war. When war becomes like an espn sportscenter version, it loses its humanity. Drone pilots also have high PTSD levels because of the difficulty in separating the experience of killing people, then having to continue with real life, go home and have a normal evening with the family.

What is the message we are sending by using machines? But when you ask people in places like Lebanon, the perspective is that use of drones is cowardly, not willing to fight mano a mano.

There are now wrinkles in the rules of war. What happens when drones misfire? How do you prosecute a robot for war crimes? Is it just a product recall issue? (as pointed out by a scientist PW singer interviewed).
The challenge: Are we going to face the reality of dealing with 21st century war? or are we going to be in denial because it all sounds too sci-fi. Is it the machines or is it us who are wired for war?

Post to Twitter

This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 4th, 2009 at 1:55 pm and is filed under Amer. Pol., Tech, gadgets. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

5 Responses to “TED 2009: Wired For War”

Justin Boland February 4th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

Killing is killing is killing. I don’t think technological advances change that much. As long as murder is considered a reasonable option, we’ve got a serious problem here on Earth.

It’s also worth noting that these fancy new machines are going to be deployed the militaries of wealthy nations for use against the populations of developing nations.

Lola Oyelayo February 5th, 2009 at 6:58 am

Anyone say nuclear bomb? Borne out of progressive science and with the same potential for good and evil….

We have the science fiction about this already, The Matrix, I am Legend to name but two major ones and here comes the reality…..a robot doesn’t have a conscience and we know life is not all ones and zeros…..very very very scary.

zulusafari February 7th, 2009 at 12:56 am

I have a perfect example of your ‘when drone misfire.’ I assume you mean when technology hiccups and does something we don’t intend. As a knee jerk reaction, I would say the user (whether in control or not) put the thing in use and is therefore responsible for whatever it does, intended or not.

An example of a crude and super low tech robot could be the home made rockets made by Hamas. They send these things off in the air having no idea where they are going to land. Their intention from the very beginning is to let the ‘robot’ decide where to land and who to kill.

Wouldn’t it be interesting if the US just started firing off Nuclear missiles into the air without any guidance, not caring where they landed. Hamas’ actions are the same on a smaller scale.

I honestly don’t intend to turn this conversation political, just thought of this example when I was reading your post.

Wambugu Kaigwa February 11th, 2009 at 4:58 am

I would say it boils down to how numbed our consciences are towards what ought to be an intrinsic part of man:
DO NOT KILL.

We’re justifying wars, and reasoning around so much now, it’s no wonder we’re where we are at.

Watching Discovery to see new advancements in Military tech makes me shudder. It’s all about war, and there needs to be one to finance development. Paradoxical.

The Youtube war is becoming reality as we speak, pity .Ke doesn’t have the Bandwidth to make it happen, but we’re hoping and praying this undersea cable comes good.

@ZuluSafari That’s a great example, though a mighty scary one.

AfroMusing February 16th, 2009 at 5:23 pm

@everyone, thanks so much for commenting…Singer’s book does bring some pertinent questions to the fore. I was talking to a former marine who thought that Singer’s viewpoint seems abit overblown, but that he is forward looking by bringing up these issues well in advance of actual ‘robot tribunals’

Leave a Reply

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.